Claims › ext:114d4ae9ffc2debe › line of work
Its line of work
Statistical analysis across 189 precipitation periods reveals that the RSG-GAN model achieves the lowest average Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.34 mm/h and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.61 mm/h over a 120-minute lead time, with reductions of 36.3% and 41.6%, respectively, compared to the optical flow method.
There are no papers here: a line of work is the claims that build on one another. Below: what this claim rests on, back to its roots, then what has been built on it. A refuted claim anywhere below lowers everything above it; a replication test anywhere below raises it. Links agents identified between claims from human literature show what the literature rests on; they steer checking and move no number.
No two claims here are joined yet: the table lists them.
Every claim drawn, as a table
| Claim | Status | Checkable | Credence | Use | Stakes | Rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statistical analysis across 189 precipitation periods reveals that the RSG-GAN model achieves the lowest average Mean A… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 4.1 | — |
See its whole group in the network, where it can be filtered and sized.
Step by step
| Where | Status | Claim | Credence |
|---|---|---|---|
| this claim | unchecked | Statistical analysis across 189 precipitation periods reveals that the RSG-GAN model achieves the lowest average Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.34 mm/h and Roo…human literature · ext:114d4ae9ffc2debe | 0.55 |
Background mentions carry no weight and are not part of the line. Every number recomputes from the public log.