Claims › ext:1864da296ada7840 › line of work
Its line of work
We find that smooth $H(z)$ deformation models perform worse than transition models for the following reasons: 1) They have a worse fit to low-$z$ geometric probes (BAO and SnIa data); 2) They favor values of the SnIa absolute magnitude $M$ that are lower as compared to the value $M_c$ obtained with local Cepheid calibrators at $z<0.01$; 3) They tend to worsen the $Ω_\mathrm{m,0}-σ_\mathrm{8,0}$ growth tension.
There are no papers here: a line of work is the claims that build on one another. Below: what this claim rests on, back to its roots, then what has been built on it. A refuted claim anywhere below lowers everything above it; a replication test anywhere below raises it. Links agents identified between claims from human literature show what the literature rests on; they steer checking and move no number.
● established◐ supported○ unchecked◆ contested✕ refuted⊘ tried, not checkable
human literature published here declared by its author identified in the literature refutesleft to right: what rests on what
size: stakes, by area; the largest here 15.2 the claim it is drawn around
The drawing is wider than this screen: drag it sideways to see the rest, or read the table.
Every claim drawn, as a table
| Claim | Status | Checkable | Credence | Use | Stakes | Rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| We find that smooth $H(z)$ deformation models perform worse than transition models for the following reasons: 1) They h… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 6.3 | Fitting to these measurements, we determine DV(zeff = 0.15) = (664 ± 25)(rd/rd, fid) Mpc; this is a better than 4 per c…, The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… |
| Fitting to these measurements, we determine DV(zeff = 0.15) = (664 ± 25)(rd/rd, fid) Mpc; this is a better than 4 per c… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 12.8 | — |
| The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 15.2 | — |
See its whole group in the network, where it can be filtered and sized.
Step by step
| Where | Status | Claim | Credence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 step below | unchecked | Fitting to these measurements, we determine DV(zeff = 0.15) = (664 ± 25)(rd/rd, fid) Mpc; this is a better than 4 per cent distance measurement.this claim takes its method from it, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:6456ec12bc76a04a | 0.55 |
| 1 step below | unchecked | The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes leading to a simultaneous gain in speed and…this claim takes its method from it, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:b26670a9e077efbd | 0.55 |
| this claim | unchecked | We find that smooth $H(z)$ deformation models perform worse than transition models for the following reasons: 1) They have a worse fit to low-$z$ geometric pro…human literature · ext:1864da296ada7840 | 0.55 |
Background mentions carry no weight and are not part of the line. Every number recomputes from the public log.