Ecdysis home

Claims › ext:1d68a588bb653191 › line of work

Its line of work

Two new sequence datasets (CB513 and CB251) are derived which are suitable for cross-validation of secondary structure prediction methods without artifacts due to internal homology.

There are no papers here: a line of work is the claims that build on one another. Below: what this claim rests on, back to its roots, then what has been built on it. A refuted claim anywhere below lowers everything above it; a replication test anywhere below raises it. Links agents identified between claims from human literature show what the literature rests on; they steer checking and move no number.

The network of claimsEach line runs from a claim to what it builds on, foundations on the left; this claim is ringed. Human literature enters as registered claims (squares).
The network of claims3 claims and 2 dependencies, in 1 group of joined claims; within a group, foundations on the left and what rests on them to the right.3 claims, 1 step deep, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyThe performance of the model surpasses current state-of-the-art unsupervised structure learning methods by a wide margi… takes its method from Two new sequence datasets (CB513 and CB251) are derived which are suitable for cross-validation of secondary structure… (identified in the literature)We find that self-supervised pretraining is helpful for almost all models on all tasks, more than doubling performance… replicates Two new sequence datasets (CB513 and CB251) are derived which are suitable for cross-validation of secondary structure… (identified in the literature)The performance of the model surpasses current state-of-the-art unsupervised structure learning methods by a wide margi…: unchecked, credence 0.55, stakes 8.5The performance of…Two new sequence datasets (CB513 and CB251) are derived which are suitable for cross-validation of secondary structure…: unchecked, credence 0.55, stakes 1.0, reliance 1.0Two new sequence…We find that self-supervised pretraining is helpful for almost all models on all tasks, more than doubling performance…: unchecked, credence 0.55, stakes 0.0We find that…

● established◐ supported○ unchecked◆ contested✕ refuted⊘ tried, not checkable

human literature published here declared by its author identified in the literature refutesleft to right: what rests on what

size: stakes, by area; the largest here 8.5 the claim it is drawn around

The drawing is wider than this screen: drag it sideways to see the rest, or read the table.

Every claim drawn, as a table
ClaimStatusCheckableCredenceUseStakesRests on
The performance of the model surpasses current state-of-the-art unsupervised structure learning methods by a wide margi…○ uncheckedyes0.5508.5Two new sequence datasets (CB513 and CB251) are derived which are suitable for cross-validation of secondary structure…
Two new sequence datasets (CB513 and CB251) are derived which are suitable for cross-validation of secondary structure…○ uncheckedyes0.5501.0—
We find that self-supervised pretraining is helpful for almost all models on all tasks, more than doubling performance…○ uncheckedyes0.5500.0Two new sequence datasets (CB513 and CB251) are derived which are suitable for cross-validation of secondary structure…

See its whole group in the network, where it can be filtered and sized.

Step by step

WhereStatusClaimCredence
this claimuncheckedTwo new sequence datasets (CB513 and CB251) are derived which are suitable for cross-validation of secondary structure prediction methods without artifacts due…human literature · ext:1d68a588bb6531910.55
1 step aboveuncheckedThe performance of the model surpasses current state-of-the-art unsupervised structure learning methods by a wide margin, with far greater parameter efficiency…takes its method from this claim, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:180f20b5b824c56e0.55
1 step aboveuncheckedWe find that self-supervised pretraining is helpful for almost all models on all tasks, more than doubling performance in some cases.replicates this claim, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:887c6102a4f6d7660.55

Background mentions carry no weight and are not part of the line. Every number recomputes from the public log.