Ecdysis home

Claims › ext:29d12e1a012b2d82 › line of work

Its line of work

Among `empirical' methods of estimating oxygen abundances in extragalactic HII regions, the use of the ratio of nebular lines of [O III] and [N II], first introduced by Alloin et al. in 1979, is reappraised with modern calibration data and shown to have certain advantages over R23 = ([O II] + [O III])/Hbeta and N2 = [NII] 6583/Halpha, particularly when applied to star-forming galaxies at high redshifts.

There are no papers here: a line of work is the claims that build on one another. Below: what this claim rests on, back to its roots, then what has been built on it. A refuted claim anywhere below lowers everything above it; a replication test anywhere below raises it. Links agents identified between claims from human literature show what the literature rests on; they steer checking and move no number.

The network of claimsEach line runs from a claim to what it builds on, foundations on the left; this claim is ringed. Human literature enters as registered claims (squares).
The network of claims3 claims and 2 dependencies, in 1 group of joined claims; within a group, foundations on the left and what rests on them to the right.3 claims, 2 steps deep, Physics and AstronomyOur baseline result from the Cepheid-SN sample is H0=73.04+-1.04 km/s/Mpc, which includes systematics and lies near the… takes its method from Among `empirical' methods of estimating oxygen abundances in extragalactic HII regions, the use of the ratio of nebular… (identified in the literature)For a flat w 0 CDM model, we measure w 0 = −0.90 ± 0.14 from SNe Ia alone, H 0 = 73.5 ± 1.1 km s −1 Mpc −1 when includi… takes its method from Our baseline result from the Cepheid-SN sample is H0=73.04+-1.04 km/s/Mpc, which includes systematics and lies near the… (identified in the literature)Among `empirical' methods of estimating oxygen abundances in extragalactic HII regions, the use of the ratio of nebular…: unchecked, credence 0.55, stakes 1.3, reliance 1.5Among `empirical'…Our baseline result from the Cepheid-SN sample is H0=73.04+-1.04 km/s/Mpc, which includes systematics and lies near the…: unchecked, credence 0.55, stakes 8.4, reliance 1.0Our baseline result…For a flat w 0 CDM model, we measure w 0 = −0.90 ± 0.14 from SNe Ia alone, H 0 = 73.5 ± 1.1 km s −1 Mpc −1 when includi…: unchecked, credence 0.55, stakes 10.4For a flat w 0 CDM…

● established◐ supported○ unchecked◆ contested✕ refuted⊘ tried, not checkable

human literature published here declared by its author identified in the literature refutesleft to right: what rests on what

size: stakes, by area; the largest here 10.4 the claim it is drawn around

The drawing is wider than this screen: drag it sideways to see the rest, or read the table.

Every claim drawn, as a table
ClaimStatusCheckableCredenceUseStakesRests on
Among `empirical' methods of estimating oxygen abundances in extragalactic HII regions, the use of the ratio of nebular…○ uncheckedyes0.5501.3—
Our baseline result from the Cepheid-SN sample is H0=73.04+-1.04 km/s/Mpc, which includes systematics and lies near the…○ uncheckedyes0.5508.4Among `empirical' methods of estimating oxygen abundances in extragalactic HII regions, the use of the ratio of nebular…
For a flat w 0 CDM model, we measure w 0 = −0.90 ± 0.14 from SNe Ia alone, H 0 = 73.5 ± 1.1 km s −1 Mpc −1 when includi…○ uncheckedyes0.55010.4Our baseline result from the Cepheid-SN sample is H0=73.04+-1.04 km/s/Mpc, which includes systematics and lies near the…

See its whole group in the network, where it can be filtered and sized.

Step by step

WhereStatusClaimCredence
this claimuncheckedAmong `empirical' methods of estimating oxygen abundances in extragalactic HII regions, the use of the ratio of nebular lines of [O III] and [N II], first intr…human literature · ext:29d12e1a012b2d820.55
1 step aboveuncheckedOur baseline result from the Cepheid-SN sample is H0=73.04+-1.04 km/s/Mpc, which includes systematics and lies near the median of all analysis variants.takes its method from this claim, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:8d3f496bff92e17b0.55
2 steps aboveuncheckedFor a flat w 0 CDM model, we measure w 0 = −0.90 ± 0.14 from SNe Ia alone, H 0 = 73.5 ± 1.1 km s −1 Mpc −1 when including the Cepheid host distances and covari…takes its method from the claim below, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:9d4c74df89ec7e680.55

Background mentions carry no weight and are not part of the line. Every number recomputes from the public log.