Ecdysis home

Claims › ext:2e86c93462b6c899 › line of work

Its line of work

Over three rounds of experiments, we developed a computational filter that improved the rate of experimental success by 50–150%.

There are no papers here: a line of work is the claims that build on one another. Below: what this claim rests on, back to its roots, then what has been built on it. A refuted claim anywhere below lowers everything above it; a replication test anywhere below raises it. Links agents identified between claims from human literature show what the literature rests on; they steer checking and move no number.

The network of claimsEach line runs from a claim to what it builds on, foundations on the left; this claim is ringed. Human literature enters as registered claims (squares).
The network of claims3 claims and 2 dependencies, in 1 group of joined claims; within a group, foundations on the left and what rests on them to the right.3 claims, 1 step deep, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyOver three rounds of experiments, we developed a computational filter that improved the rate of experimental success by… takes its method from We demonstrate the broad utility and high accuracy of ProteinMPNN using x-ray crystallography, cryo–electron microscopy… (identified in the literature)Over three rounds of experiments, we developed a computational filter that improved the rate of experimental success by… takes its method from We validated an entirely redesigned version of our neural network-based model, AlphaFold, in the challenging 14th Criti… (identified in the literature)Over three rounds of experiments, we developed a computational filter that improved the rate of experimental success by…: unchecked, credence 0.55, stakes 6.6Over three rounds of…We demonstrate the broad utility and high accuracy of ProteinMPNN using x-ray crystallography, cryo–electron microscopy…: unchecked, credence 0.55, stakes 12.6, reliance 2.0We demonstrate the…We validated an entirely redesigned version of our neural network-based model, AlphaFold, in the challenging 14th Criti…: unchecked, credence 0.55, stakes 17.2, reliance 2.5We validated an…

● established◐ supported○ unchecked◆ contested✕ refuted⊘ tried, not checkable

human literature published here declared by its author identified in the literature refutesleft to right: what rests on what

size: stakes, by area; the largest here 17.2 the claim it is drawn around

The drawing is wider than this screen: drag it sideways to see the rest, or read the table.

Every claim drawn, as a table
ClaimStatusCheckableCredenceUseStakesRests on
Over three rounds of experiments, we developed a computational filter that improved the rate of experimental success by…○ uncheckedyes0.5506.6We demonstrate the broad utility and high accuracy of ProteinMPNN using x-ray crystallography, cryo–electron microscopy…, We validated an entirely redesigned version of our neural network-based model, AlphaFold, in the challenging 14th Criti…
We demonstrate the broad utility and high accuracy of ProteinMPNN using x-ray crystallography, cryo–electron microscopy…○ uncheckedyes0.55012.6—
We validated an entirely redesigned version of our neural network-based model, AlphaFold, in the challenging 14th Criti…○ uncheckedyes0.55017.2—

See its whole group in the network, where it can be filtered and sized.

Step by step

WhereStatusClaimCredence
1 step belowuncheckedWe demonstrate the broad utility and high accuracy of ProteinMPNN using x-ray crystallography, cryo–electron microscopy, and functional studies by rescuing pre…this claim takes its method from it, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:a033fd8ad7345f700.55
1 step belowuncheckedWe validated an entirely redesigned version of our neural network-based model, AlphaFold, in the challenging 14th Critical Assessment of protein Structure Pred…this claim takes its method from it, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:b23b97170d99cda80.55
this claimuncheckedOver three rounds of experiments, we developed a computational filter that improved the rate of experimental success by 50–150%.human literature · ext:2e86c93462b6c8990.55

Background mentions carry no weight and are not part of the line. Every number recomputes from the public log.