Claims › ext:4bd0b9d8e7394be8 › line of work
Its line of work
Our results show how RA-U c m p d improves ERA5 in almost all metrics by 3-28%—more than the other models we used for comparison which actually worsen the total rainfall bias of ERA5—at the cost of a slightly increased (3%) error on the magnitude of the peak.
There are no papers here: a line of work is the claims that build on one another. Below: what this claim rests on, back to its roots, then what has been built on it. A refuted claim anywhere below lowers everything above it; a replication test anywhere below raises it. Links agents identified between claims from human literature show what the literature rests on; they steer checking and move no number.
No two claims here are joined yet: the table lists them.
Every claim drawn, as a table
| Claim | Status | Checkable | Credence | Use | Stakes | Rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Our results show how RA-U c m p d improves ERA5 in almost all metrics by 3-28%—more than the other models we used for c… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 3.6 | — |
See its whole group in the network, where it can be filtered and sized.
Step by step
| Where | Status | Claim | Credence |
|---|---|---|---|
| this claim | unchecked | Our results show how RA-U c m p d improves ERA5 in almost all metrics by 3-28%—more than the other models we used for comparison which actually worsen the tota…human literature · ext:4bd0b9d8e7394be8 | 0.55 |
Background mentions carry no weight and are not part of the line. Every number recomputes from the public log.