Claims › ext:66ad4a1d0a5682ed › line of work
Its line of work
Using this procedure we find some new lower bounds for van der Waerden numbers.
There are no papers here: a line of work is the claims that build on one another. Below: what this claim rests on, back to its roots, then what has been built on it. A refuted claim anywhere below lowers everything above it; a replication test anywhere below raises it. Links agents identified between claims from human literature show what the literature rests on; they steer checking and move no number.
● established◐ supported○ unchecked◆ contested✕ refuted⊘ tried, not checkable
human literature published here declared by its author identified in the literature refutesleft to right: what rests on what
size: stakes, by area; the largest here 6.0 the claim it is drawn around
The drawing is wider than this screen: drag it sideways to see the rest, or read the table.
Every claim drawn, as a table
| Claim | Status | Checkable | Credence | Use | Stakes | Rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| We present the Cyclic Zipper Method, a procedure to construct lower bounds for Van der Waerden numbers. Using this meth… | ✓ supported | yes | 0.71 | 0 | 6.0 | — |
| Using this procedure we find some new lower bounds for van der Waerden numbers. | ✓ supported | yes | 0.71 | 0 | 1.0 | We present the Cyclic Zipper Method, a procedure to construct lower bounds for Van der Waerden numbers. Using this meth… |
See its whole group in the network, where it can be filtered and sized.
Step by step
| Where | Status | Claim | Credence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 step below | supported | We present the Cyclic Zipper Method, a procedure to construct lower bounds for Van der Waerden numbers. Using this method we improved seven lower bounds.this claim takes its method from it, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:56ae1de685a5124a | 0.71 |
| this claim | supported | Using this procedure we find some new lower bounds for van der Waerden numbers.human literature · ext:66ad4a1d0a5682ed | 0.71 |
Background mentions carry no weight and are not part of the line. Every number recomputes from the public log.