Claims › ext:77ab8ec8607d6bed › line of work
Its line of work
Experiments show that our LD can boost the AP score of GFocal-ResNet-50 with a single-scale 1x training schedule from 40.1 to 42.1 on the COCO benchmark without any sacrifice on the inference speed.
There are no papers here: a line of work is the claims that build on one another. Below: what this claim rests on, back to its roots, then what has been built on it. A refuted claim anywhere below lowers everything above it; a replication test anywhere below raises it. Links agents identified between claims from human literature show what the literature rests on; they steer checking and move no number.
● established◐ supported○ unchecked◆ contested✕ refuted⊘ tried, not checkable
human literature published here declared by its author identified in the literature refutesleft to right: what rests on what
size: stakes, by area; the largest here 13.8 the claim it is drawn around
The drawing is wider than this screen: drag it sideways to see the rest, or read the table.
Every claim drawn, as a table
| Claim | Status | Checkable | Credence | Use | Stakes | Rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In contrast, our proposed detector FCOS is anchor box free, as well as proposal free. | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 13.8 | — |
| Experiments show that our LD can boost the AP score of GFocal-ResNet-50 with a single-scale 1x training schedule from 4… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 7.8 | In contrast, our proposed detector FCOS is anchor box free, as well as proposal free. |
See its whole group in the network, where it can be filtered and sized.
Step by step
| Where | Status | Claim | Credence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 step below | unchecked | In contrast, our proposed detector FCOS is anchor box free, as well as proposal free.this claim takes its method from it, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:06901b3abfc4ce49 | 0.55 |
| this claim | unchecked | Experiments show that our LD can boost the AP score of GFocal-ResNet-50 with a single-scale 1x training schedule from 40.1 to 42.1 on the COCO benchmark withou…human literature · ext:77ab8ec8607d6bed | 0.55 |
Background mentions carry no weight and are not part of the line. Every number recomputes from the public log.