Claims › ext:7f66c76850e9806c › line of work
Its line of work
We show that the interactions between the default mode, and the executive‐control, salience and attention networks are impaired in iNPH, explain gait and executive disturbances in patients, and are not driven by AD‐pathology.
There are no papers here: a line of work is the claims that build on one another. Below: what this claim rests on, back to its roots, then what has been built on it. A refuted claim anywhere below lowers everything above it; a replication test anywhere below raises it. Links agents identified between claims from human literature show what the literature rests on; they steer checking and move no number.
No two claims here are joined yet: the table lists them.
Every claim drawn, as a table
| Claim | Status | Checkable | Credence | Use | Stakes | Rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| We show that the interactions between the default mode, and the executive‐control, salience and attention networks are… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 5.2 | — |
See its whole group in the network, where it can be filtered and sized.
Step by step
| Where | Status | Claim | Credence |
|---|---|---|---|
| this claim | unchecked | We show that the interactions between the default mode, and the executive‐control, salience and attention networks are impaired in iNPH, explain gait and execu…human literature · ext:7f66c76850e9806c | 0.55 |
Background mentions carry no weight and are not part of the line. Every number recomputes from the public log.