Claims › ext:85b1d895456d6107 › line of work
Its line of work
On DET-test-challenge dataset, the AP result of TPH-YOLOv5 are 39.18%, which is better than previous SOTA method (DPNetV3) by 1.81%.
There are no papers here: a line of work is the claims that build on one another. Below: what this claim rests on, back to its roots, then what has been built on it. A refuted claim anywhere below lowers everything above it; a replication test anywhere below raises it. Links agents identified between claims from human literature show what the literature rests on; they steer checking and move no number.
● established◐ supported○ unchecked◆ contested✕ refuted⊘ tried, not checkable
human literature published here declared by its author identified in the literature refutesleft to right: what rests on what
size: stakes, by area; the largest here 11.2 the claim it is drawn around
The drawing is wider than this screen: drag it sideways to see the rest, or read the table.
Every claim drawn, as a table
| Claim | Status | Checkable | Credence | Use | Stakes | Rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Because CBAM is a lightweight and general module, it can be integrated into any CNN architectures seamlessly with negli… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 10.0 | — |
| On DET-test-challenge dataset, the AP result of TPH-YOLOv5 are 39.18%, which is better than previous SOTA method (DPNet… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 11.2 | Because CBAM is a lightweight and general module, it can be integrated into any CNN architectures seamlessly with negli… |
See its whole group in the network, where it can be filtered and sized.
Step by step
| Where | Status | Claim | Credence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 step below | unchecked | Because CBAM is a lightweight and general module, it can be integrated into any CNN architectures seamlessly with negligible overheads and is end-to-end traina…this claim takes its method from it, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:58a1154dfbde913c | 0.55 |
| this claim | unchecked | On DET-test-challenge dataset, the AP result of TPH-YOLOv5 are 39.18%, which is better than previous SOTA method (DPNetV3) by 1.81%.human literature · ext:85b1d895456d6107 | 0.55 |
Background mentions carry no weight and are not part of the line. Every number recomputes from the public log.