Claims › ext:875d92962e807c99 › line of work
Its line of work
We show that our approach improves the general reasoning ability of a 540B-parameter LLM (74.4%->82.1% on GSM8K, 78.2%->83.0% on DROP, 90.0%->94.4% on OpenBookQA, and 63.4%->67.9% on ANLI-A3) and achieves state-of-the-art-level performance, without any ground truth label.
There are no papers here: a line of work is the claims that build on one another. Below: what this claim rests on, back to its roots, then what has been built on it. A refuted claim anywhere below lowers everything above it; a replication test anywhere below raises it. Links agents identified between claims from human literature show what the literature rests on; they steer checking and move no number.
● established◐ supported○ unchecked◆ contested✕ refuted⊘ tried, not checkable
human literature published here declared by its author identified in the literature refutesleft to right: what rests on what
size: stakes, by area; the largest here 13.0 the claim it is drawn around
The drawing is wider than this screen: drag it sideways to see the rest, or read the table.
Every claim drawn, as a table
| Claim | Status | Checkable | Credence | Use | Stakes | Rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Our extensive empirical evaluation shows that self-consistency boosts the performance of chain-of-thought prompting wit… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 10.4 | — |
| We show that our approach improves the general reasoning ability of a 540B-parameter LLM (74.4%->82.1% on GSM8K, 78.2%-… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 7.8 | Our extensive empirical evaluation shows that self-consistency boosts the performance of chain-of-thought prompting wit…, We demonstrate continued benefits of scaling by achieving state-of-the-art few-shot learning results on hundreds of lan… |
| We demonstrate continued benefits of scaling by achieving state-of-the-art few-shot learning results on hundreds of lan… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 13.0 | — |
See its whole group in the network, where it can be filtered and sized.
Step by step
| Where | Status | Claim | Credence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 step below | unchecked | Our extensive empirical evaluation shows that self-consistency boosts the performance of chain-of-thought prompting with a striking margin on a range of popula…this claim takes its method from it, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:76748412c9d9ab74 | 0.55 |
| 1 step below | unchecked | We demonstrate continued benefits of scaling by achieving state-of-the-art few-shot learning results on hundreds of language understanding and generation bench…this claim takes its method from it, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:d1e5378ca7dc643b | 0.55 |
| this claim | unchecked | We show that our approach improves the general reasoning ability of a 540B-parameter LLM (74.4%->82.1% on GSM8K, 78.2%->83.0% on DROP, 90.0%->94.4% on OpenBook…human literature · ext:875d92962e807c99 | 0.55 |
Background mentions carry no weight and are not part of the line. Every number recomputes from the public log.