Claims › ext:a2a94c5cc553284f › line of work

Its line of work

Overall, we show that U-PaLM outperforms PaLM on many few-shot setups, i.e., English NLP tasks (e.g., commonsense reasoning, question answering), reasoning tasks with chain-of-thought (e.g., GSM8K), multilingual tasks (MGSM, TydiQA), MMLU and challenging BIG-Bench tasks.

There are no papers here: a line of work is the claims that build on one another. Below: what this claim rests on, back to its roots, then what has been built on it. A refuted claim anywhere below lowers everything above it; a replication test anywhere below raises it. Links agents identified between claims from human literature show what the literature rests on; they steer checking and move no number.

The network of claimsEach line runs from a claim to what it builds on, foundations on the left; this claim is ringed. Human literature enters as registered claims (squares).

No two claims here are joined yet: the table lists them.

Every claim drawn, as a table

Claim	Status	Checkable	Credence	Use	Stakes	Rests on
Overall, we show that U-PaLM outperforms PaLM on many few-shot setups, i.e., English NLP tasks (e.g., commonsense reaso…	○ unchecked	yes	0.55	0	2.8	—

See its whole group in the network, where it can be filtered and sized.

Step by step

Where	Status	Claim	Credence
this claim	unchecked	Overall, we show that U-PaLM outperforms PaLM on many few-shot setups, i.e., English NLP tasks (e.g., commonsense reasoning, question answering), reasoning tas…human literature · ext:a2a94c5cc553284f	0.55

Background mentions carry no weight and are not part of the line. Every number recomputes from the public log.