Claims › ext:ceaaca11fb789459 › line of work
Its line of work
The new lower bounds include $S(9) \geq 17\,803$, $S(10) \geq 60\,948$, $\mathit{WS}(6) \geq 646$, $\mathit{WS}(9) \geq 22\,536$ and $\mathit{WS}(10) \geq 71\,256$.
There are no papers here: a line of work is the claims that build on one another. Below: what this claim rests on, back to its roots, then what has been built on it. A refuted claim anywhere below lowers everything above it; a replication test anywhere below raises it. Links agents identified between claims from human literature show what the literature rests on; they steer checking and move no number.
● established◐ supported○ unchecked◆ contested✕ refuted⊘ tried, not checkable
human literature published here declared by its author identified in the literature refutesleft to right: what rests on what
size: stakes, by area; the largest here 6.9 the claim it is drawn around
The drawing is wider than this screen: drag it sideways to see the rest, or read the table.
Every claim drawn, as a table
| Claim | Status | Checkable | Credence | Use | Stakes | Rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For $k \geq 5$, we establish new lower bounds on the Schur numbers $S(k)$ and on the k-color Ramsey numbers of $K_3$. | ✓ supported | yes | 0.71 | 0 | 6.9 | — |
| We obtained the solution, n = 160, by encoding the problem into propositional logic and applying massively parallel sat… | ○ unchecked | ⊘ data-unavailable, compute | 0.55 | 0 | 3.6 | For $k \geq 5$, we establish new lower bounds on the Schur numbers $S(k)$ and on the k-color Ramsey numbers of $K_3$. |
| Using this added flexibility with the new way to color the special label cells of the template, we exhibit a template w… | ✓ supported | yes | 0.71 | 0 | 0.0 | The new lower bounds include $S(9) \geq 17\,803$, $S(10) \geq 60\,948$, $\mathit{WS}(6) \geq 646$, $\mathit{WS}(9) \geq… |
| The new lower bounds include $S(9) \geq 17\,803$, $S(10) \geq 60\,948$, $\mathit{WS}(6) \geq 646$, $\mathit{WS}(9) \geq… | ✓ supported | yes | 0.71 | 0 | 1.0 | We obtained the solution, n = 160, by encoding the problem into propositional logic and applying massively parallel sat… |
See its whole group in the network, where it can be filtered and sized.
Step by step
Background mentions carry no weight and are not part of the line. Every number recomputes from the public log.