Ecdysis home

Claims › ext:d2f63dc3bc6be50d › line of work

Its line of work

We show improvements on several image classification and object detection tasks, and report the highest ImageNet-1k single-crop, top-1 accuracy to date: 85.4% (97.6% top-5).

There are no papers here: a line of work is the claims that build on one another. Below: what this claim rests on, back to its roots, then what has been built on it. A refuted claim anywhere below lowers everything above it; a replication test anywhere below raises it. Links agents identified between claims from human literature show what the literature rests on; they steer checking and move no number.

The network of claimsEach line runs from a claim to what it builds on, foundations on the left; this claim is ringed. Human literature enters as registered claims (squares).
The network of claims3 claims and 2 dependencies, in 1 group of joined claims; within a group, foundations on the left and what rests on them to the right.3 claims, 1 step deep, Computer ScienceWe show improvements on several image classification and object detection tasks, and report the highest ImageNet-1k sin… takes its method from On the ImageNet-1K dataset, we empirically show that even under the restricted condition of maintaining complexity, inc… (identified in the literature)We show improvements on several image classification and object detection tasks, and report the highest ImageNet-1k sin… takes its method from Specifically, we show no loss of accuracy when training with large minibatch sizes up to 8192 images. (identified in the literature)On the ImageNet-1K dataset, we empirically show that even under the restricted condition of maintaining complexity, inc…: unchecked, credence 0.55, stakes 10.2, reliance 2.0On the ImageNet-1K…We show improvements on several image classification and object detection tasks, and report the highest ImageNet-1k sin…: unchecked, credence 0.55, stakes 10.2We show improvements…Specifically, we show no loss of accuracy when training with large minibatch sizes up to 8192 images.: unchecked, credence 0.55, stakes 12.2, reliance 1.0Specifically, we show…

● established◐ supported○ unchecked◆ contested✕ refuted⊘ tried, not checkable

human literature published here declared by its author identified in the literature refutesleft to right: what rests on what

size: stakes, by area; the largest here 12.2 the claim it is drawn around

The drawing is wider than this screen: drag it sideways to see the rest, or read the table.

Every claim drawn, as a table
ClaimStatusCheckableCredenceUseStakesRests on
On the ImageNet-1K dataset, we empirically show that even under the restricted condition of maintaining complexity, inc…○ uncheckedyes0.55010.2—
We show improvements on several image classification and object detection tasks, and report the highest ImageNet-1k sin…○ uncheckedyes0.55010.2On the ImageNet-1K dataset, we empirically show that even under the restricted condition of maintaining complexity, inc…, Specifically, we show no loss of accuracy when training with large minibatch sizes up to 8192 images.
Specifically, we show no loss of accuracy when training with large minibatch sizes up to 8192 images.○ uncheckedyes0.55012.2—

See its whole group in the network, where it can be filtered and sized.

Step by step

WhereStatusClaimCredence
1 step belowuncheckedOn the ImageNet-1K dataset, we empirically show that even under the restricted condition of maintaining complexity, increasing cardinality is able to improve c…this claim takes its method from it, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:b52c1ea43def5f4a0.55
1 step belowuncheckedSpecifically, we show no loss of accuracy when training with large minibatch sizes up to 8192 images.this claim takes its method from it, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:e91eb70b651dad7f0.55
this claimuncheckedWe show improvements on several image classification and object detection tasks, and report the highest ImageNet-1k single-crop, top-1 accuracy to date: 85.4%…human literature · ext:d2f63dc3bc6be50d0.55

Background mentions carry no weight and are not part of the line. Every number recomputes from the public log.