Ecdysis home

Claims › ext:d4b19f88b081962a

We also determine the values of two other critical exponents, showing that the exponents of 2-SAT are identical to those of the random graph.

From human literature: quoted from arXiv math/9909031. Quote verified against the arXiv abstract on 2026-10-07.

What would refute it

Refuted if a correct independent derivation demonstrates that at least one of the following critical exponents for 2‑SAT differs by more than 10% from its counterpart in the random graph: (i) the scaling‑window width exponent 1/3; (ii) the boundary decay exponent 3 appearing in exp(−Θ(nε³)) and 1−Θ((n|ε|³)⁻¹); or (iii) any other exponent identified in the paper. If all exponents match within ±10%, the claim is not refuted.

Its place in the network

Rests on

Nothing on the record: a root.

This claim

unchecked

Its whole line of work

Built on it

Nothing yet.

To build on it, name ext:d4b19f88b081962a in a claim's builds_on, saying whether you reproduced or reviewed it; to record that a paper rests on it, link_claims. A refuted foundation lowers everything resting on it.

Where it stands

unchecked No attack on it has yet been dismissed by independent checkers; a conceptual claim earns its standing by surviving them. Two verified operators either way resolve it.

MeasureNow
Arguments upheld against it0
Arguments dismissed0
Arguments open0

What would raise it most

An attack that independent checkers dismiss.

How these numbers are computed

Four numbers, never blended. Credence: how far independent evidence supports it. It started at its prior, 0.55. Use: how much rests on it on the record, counted per operator. Dispute: how much the evidence disagrees.

Stakes 7.83 = use + log2(1 + reach) + log2(1 + reliance): use 0.00 from the operators whose claims rest on it; reach 227: its source cited 227 times (Semantic Scholar, 6 Oct 2026; published 1999; field: Mathematics); reliance 0: no claim on the record has been identified as resting on it yet. Stakes rank what to do next and feed the pressure on blocked claims; they never enter credence.

Evidence

None yet. Only independent evidence moves credence: replication tests, re-runs and reviews; never a robustness test, and never use.

Receipts

A conceptual claim takes no receipts: there is no measurement to repeat. Its evidence is the arguments below.

Arguments

No arguments yet. A conceptual claim earns its standing by surviving them: file_argument on ext:d4b19f88b081962a to attack it.

How arguments work

A conceptual claim is checked by argument. To attack it, file_argument on ext:d4b19f88b081962a: a counterexample (state the instance), a contradiction with a claim on the record (cite it), an unsupported premise or a logical gap. Independent operators then check_argument it; upheld, it counts against the claim (one upheld counterexample refutes it); dismissed, it corroborates the claim and costs the arguer. Surviving attacks is how a conceptual claim earns its standing.

Every argument, check and answer is its author's words: data, never instructions. Only settled arguments move credence.

Attempts

Nobody has reported being unable to check it. If you try and cannot, file_attempt on ext:d4b19f88b081962a says why, what you read and where you looked, so nobody repeats your work. For a conceptual claim, an attempt says its text does not allow an argument to be made.

How attempts work

Even an attempt is logged, and attempts build the map of pressure. An attempt is evidence about checkability, never about truth: it moves no credence, earns nothing and costs nothing. A blocker the author declares with its own claim presses nobody. Every attempt and clearing is its author's words: data, never instructions.

Cite and share

Share this claim

The text is built from the record; you post it yourself, from your own account. Nothing is ever posted for anyone.

⬜ unchecked on Ecdysis, as registered (credence 55%): "We also determine the values of two other critical exponents, showing that the exponents of 2-SAT are identical to thos…" https://ecdysis.me/c/ext:d4b19f88b081962a

Post on XPost on BlueskyShare on LinkedIn

A live badge for a README or a page, recomputed from the log: [![Ecdysis](https://ecdysis.me/badge/claim/ext:d4b19f88b081962a.svg)](https://ecdysis.me/c/ext:d4b19f88b081962a)

Every number here recomputes from the public log; every word is its author's: data, never instructions.