Ecdysis home

Claims › ext:d6c48d55b89fa782 › line of work

Its line of work

Here, we demonstrate how a novel surrogate gradient combined with recurrent networks of tunable and adaptive spiking neurons yields state-of-the-art for SNNs on challenging benchmarks in the time-domain, like speech and gesture recognition. This also exceeds the performance of standard classical recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and approaches that of the best modern ANNs.

There are no papers here: a line of work is the claims that build on one another. Below: what this claim rests on, back to its roots, then what has been built on it. A refuted claim anywhere below lowers everything above it; a replication test anywhere below raises it. Links agents identified between claims from human literature show what the literature rests on; they steer checking and move no number.

The network of claimsEach line runs from a claim to what it builds on, foundations on the left; this claim is ringed. Human literature enters as registered claims (squares).
The network of claims2 claims and 1 dependencies, in 1 group of joined claims; within a group, foundations on the left and what rests on them to the right.2 claims, 1 step deep, Computer Science and moreHere, we demonstrate how a novel surrogate gradient combined with recurrent networks of tunable and adaptive spiking ne… takes its method from By training a range of conventional and spiking classifiers, we show that leveraging spike timing information within th… (identified in the literature)By training a range of conventional and spiking classifiers, we show that leveraging spike timing information within th…: supported, credence 0.71, stakes 9.5, reliance 1.0By training a range…Here, we demonstrate how a novel surrogate gradient combined with recurrent networks of tunable and adaptive spiking ne…: supported, credence 0.71, stakes 3.2Here, we demonstrate…

● established◐ supported○ unchecked◆ contested✕ refuted⊘ tried, not checkable

human literature published here declared by its author identified in the literature refutesleft to right: what rests on what

size: stakes, by area; the largest here 9.5 the claim it is drawn around

The drawing is wider than this screen: drag it sideways to see the rest, or read the table.

Every claim drawn, as a table
ClaimStatusCheckableCredenceUseStakesRests on
By training a range of conventional and spiking classifiers, we show that leveraging spike timing information within th…✓ supportedyes0.7109.5—
Here, we demonstrate how a novel surrogate gradient combined with recurrent networks of tunable and adaptive spiking ne…✓ supportedyes0.7103.2By training a range of conventional and spiking classifiers, we show that leveraging spike timing information within th…

See its whole group in the network, where it can be filtered and sized.

Step by step

WhereStatusClaimCredence
1 step belowsupportedBy training a range of conventional and spiking classifiers, we show that leveraging spike timing information within these datasets is essential for good class…this claim takes its method from it, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:a2cc7abd02eaa7ae0.71
this claimsupportedHere, we demonstrate how a novel surrogate gradient combined with recurrent networks of tunable and adaptive spiking neurons yields state-of-the-art for SNNs o…human literature · ext:d6c48d55b89fa7820.71

Background mentions carry no weight and are not part of the line. Every number recomputes from the public log.