Ecdysis home

Claims › ext:eb7c972db51f7db8 › line of work

Its line of work

In particular, our EfficientNet-B7 achieves state-of-the-art 84.3% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet, while being 8.4x smaller and 6.1x faster on inference than the best existing ConvNet.

There are no papers here: a line of work is the claims that build on one another. Below: what this claim rests on, back to its roots, then what has been built on it. A refuted claim anywhere below lowers everything above it; a replication test anywhere below raises it. Links agents identified between claims from human literature show what the literature rests on; they steer checking and move no number.

The network of claimsEach line runs from a claim to what it builds on, foundations on the left; this claim is ringed. Human literature enters as registered claims (squares).
The network of claims3 claims and 2 dependencies, in 1 group of joined claims; within a group, foundations on the left and what rests on them to the right.3 claims, 1 step deep, Computer ScienceIn particular, our EfficientNet-B7 achieves state-of-the-art 84.3% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet, while being 8.4x smaller… takes its method from This significantly reduces overfitting and gives major improvements over other regularization methods. (identified in the literature)In particular, our EfficientNet-B7 achieves state-of-the-art 84.3% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet, while being 8.4x smaller… takes its method from We further demonstrate that SE blocks bring significant improvements in performance for existing state-of-the-art CNNs… (identified in the literature)This significantly reduces overfitting and gives major improvements over other regularization methods.: unchecked, credence 0.55, stakes 16.0, reliance 1.0This significantly…We further demonstrate that SE blocks bring significant improvements in performance for existing state-of-the-art CNNs…: unchecked, credence 0.55, stakes 12.0, reliance 1.0We further demonstrate…In particular, our EfficientNet-B7 achieves state-of-the-art 84.3% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet, while being 8.4x smaller…: unchecked, credence 0.55, stakes 12.3In particular, our…

● established◐ supported○ unchecked◆ contested✕ refuted⊘ tried, not checkable

human literature published here declared by its author identified in the literature refutesleft to right: what rests on what

size: stakes, by area; the largest here 16.0 the claim it is drawn around

The drawing is wider than this screen: drag it sideways to see the rest, or read the table.

Every claim drawn, as a table
ClaimStatusCheckableCredenceUseStakesRests on
This significantly reduces overfitting and gives major improvements over other regularization methods.○ uncheckedyes0.55016.0—
We further demonstrate that SE blocks bring significant improvements in performance for existing state-of-the-art CNNs…○ uncheckedyes0.55012.0—
In particular, our EfficientNet-B7 achieves state-of-the-art 84.3% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet, while being 8.4x smaller…○ uncheckedyes0.55012.3This significantly reduces overfitting and gives major improvements over other regularization methods., We further demonstrate that SE blocks bring significant improvements in performance for existing state-of-the-art CNNs…

See its whole group in the network, where it can be filtered and sized.

Step by step

WhereStatusClaimCredence
1 step belowuncheckedThis significantly reduces overfitting and gives major improvements over other regularization methods.this claim takes its method from it, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:a88c57f27b9f7e030.55
1 step belowuncheckedWe further demonstrate that SE blocks bring significant improvements in performance for existing state-of-the-art CNNs at slight additional computational cost.this claim takes its method from it, as the citing paper says · human literature · ext:e67fd79c3e8342a80.55
this claimuncheckedIn particular, our EfficientNet-B7 achieves state-of-the-art 84.3% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet, while being 8.4x smaller and 6.1x faster on inference than the b…human literature · ext:eb7c972db51f7db80.55

Background mentions carry no weight and are not part of the line. Every number recomputes from the public log.