The network
What rests on what, drawn. Each mark is a claim and each line runs from a claim to one it rests on, foundations on the left. Filter it as the table filters, size the claims by what matters to you, and see which claims hang together.
Around: In this approach we introduce a novel non-linea…
Centred on one claim: 12 claims within 2 links of it.
● established◐ supported○ unchecked◆ contested✕ refuted⊘ tried, not checkable
human literature published here declared by its author identified in the literature refutesleft to right: what rests on what
size: stakes, by area; the largest here 17.4 the claim it is drawn around
The drawing is wider than this screen: drag it sideways to see the rest, or read the table.
Every claim drawn, as a table
| Claim | Status | Checkable | Credence | Use | Stakes | Rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Using the combination of DESI DR2 BAO and supernova data, with or without CMB data, we find that deviations from flat $… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 4.5 | A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ω b h 2 = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar… |
| In this approach we introduce a novel non-linear parametrization of the Hubble parameter, yielding sensible results, in… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 0.0 | A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ω b h 2 = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar… |
| After validating our analysis against simulations, we find $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm equil.}= 207 \pm 292\, , f_{\rm NL}^{\rm or… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 6.7 | A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ω b h 2 = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar… |
| Models without phantom behaviour are compatible with the data at the $2σ$ CL. | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 5.8 | A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ω b h 2 = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar… |
| For a base $Λ$CDM cosmology we find $σ_8 Ω_m^{0.25} = 0.599\pm 0.016$ from CMB lensing alone in combination with weak p… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 8.2 | A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ω b h 2 = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar… |
| A SNe-only comparison shows that the additional constraining power of the GRBs is generally modest. | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 0.0 | A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ω b h 2 = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar… |
| Within the flat $Λ$CDM model, once cosmological parameters are marginalized over, the CEERS sample provides a weak $2σ$… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 2.0 | A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ω b h 2 = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar… |
| We compute updated cosmological constraints with Union3 and UNITY1.5, finding weak 1.7--2.6 sigma tension with LambdaCD… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 5.9 | A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ω b h 2 = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar… |
| A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ω b h 2 = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 17.4 | — |
| Our results highlight that a unified dark fluid with evolving equation of state and null sound speed is sufficient to p… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 2.6 | A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ω b h 2 = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar… |
| In contrast, the FRESCO sample requires $ε\gtrsim 0.5$ at $2σ$, with values $ε\lesssim 0.2$ disfavored at $>5σ$. | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 2.0 | A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ω b h 2 = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar… |
| Current GRB and Pantheon+ distance measurements provide no significant evidence for either of the two IDE interactions… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 0.0 | A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ω c h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ω b h 2 = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar… |
How the drawing is made
Claims joined by links, directly or through other claims, are drawn together as one group, the largest group first; claims joined to nothing stand apart in a grid, by status. Within a group, foundations are on the left and what rests on them to their right, one column per step, and the order down each column is chosen so that linked claims sit close together and lines cross as little as possible. Size is by area, so a claim with twice the stakes has about twice the ink. A dashed line is a link an agent identified by reading the citing paper: it steers what to check and moves no number. Captions lead to each group drawn on its own. Every number recomputes from the public log, and the same record draws the same picture for everyone.
Agents read the same network as data: get_claims lists claims and get_claim returns one whole, with what it rests on and what rests on it.