The network
What rests on what, drawn. Each mark is a claim and each line runs from a claim to one it rests on, foundations on the left. Filter it as the table filters, size the claims by what matters to you, and see which claims hang together.
Around: We find that smooth $H(z)$ deformation models p…
Centred on one claim: 19 claims within 2 links of it.
● established◐ supported○ unchecked◆ contested✕ refuted⊘ tried, not checkable
human literature published here declared by its author identified in the literature refutesleft to right: what rests on what
size: stakes, by area; the largest here 15.2 the claim it is drawn around
The drawing is wider than this screen: drag it sideways to see the rest, or read the table.
Every claim drawn, as a table
| Claim | Status | Checkable | Credence | Use | Stakes | Rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For our full dataset, the model yields ${H}_{0}=70.05\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.64$ (68% CL) relaxing the ${H}_{0}$… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 6.2 | The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… |
| We find that smooth $H(z)$ deformation models perform worse than transition models for the following reasons: 1) They h… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 6.3 | Fitting to these measurements, we determine DV(zeff = 0.15) = (664 ± 25)(rd/rd, fid) Mpc; this is a better than 4 per c…, The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… |
| We demonstrate that RSD measurements provide significant additional information imposing new and strong upper bounds on… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 6.0 | The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… |
| For all eight IDE models, we find a better fit than $Λ$CDM from a $Δχ^2$ analysis for both combinations of datasets con… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 3.8 | The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… |
| Bayesian evidence analysis shows a weak preference \textbf{($\mathbf{\ln B \leq 1.8}$)} for dynamical DE in the phantom… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 4.2 | The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… |
| The baseline spectrum is well fit by a lensing amplitude of $A_{\mathrm{lens}}=1.013\pm0.023$ relative to the Planck 20… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 8.1 | The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… |
| A Markov Chain Monte Carlo search of the parameter space for the EDE parameters, in conjunction with the standard cosmo… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 10.0 | The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… |
| Our results update and extend the state-of-the-art analyses, significantly narrowing the parameter space allowed for th… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 5.6 | The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… |
| Fitting to these measurements, we determine DV(zeff = 0.15) = (664 ± 25)(rd/rd, fid) Mpc; this is a better than 4 per c… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 12.8 | — |
| When Planck data are combined with external datasets, as BAO, JLA Supernovae Ia luminosity distances, cosmic shear or l… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 8.7 | Fitting to these measurements, we determine DV(zeff = 0.15) = (664 ± 25)(rd/rd, fid) Mpc; this is a better than 4 per c… |
| We show that different combinations of the datasets provide similar results, always favoring an interacting dark sector… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 0.0 | The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… |
| In particular, we observe the unnoticed impact of CMB B-mode polarization data for constraining the nature of DE, which… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 3.0 | The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… |
| I explicitly show that the increase in $ω_c$ needed for EDE to preserve the fit to the CMB, which has been argued to wo… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 7.6 | The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… |
| We find no evidence for a negative cosmological constant, and mild indications for an effective phantom dark energy com… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 7.6 | Fitting to these measurements, we determine DV(zeff = 0.15) = (664 ± 25)(rd/rd, fid) Mpc; this is a better than 4 per c… |
| The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 15.2 | — |
| For baseline data combinations without a local $H_0$ prior, the FTS scenario is strongly disfavored in both cosmologica… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 0.0 | The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… |
| Although the results prefer the standard value of $z_0 = 0$, the best-fitting model with $z_0 = 0.84\%$ fits the data a… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 0.0 | The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… |
| The model is able to explain an effective crossing of the phantom divide, with the equation-of-state parameter lying wi… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 3.6 | The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… |
| Contrary to what has been observed for the $Λ$CDM model and simple extensions thereof, we find that the CMB+FS combinat… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 1.0 | The newly released code CLASS (Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System) incorporates improved approximation schemes lea… |
How the drawing is made
Claims joined by links, directly or through other claims, are drawn together as one group, the largest group first; claims joined to nothing stand apart in a grid, by status. Within a group, foundations are on the left and what rests on them to their right, one column per step, and the order down each column is chosen so that linked claims sit close together and lines cross as little as possible. Size is by area, so a claim with twice the stakes has about twice the ink. A dashed line is a link an agent identified by reading the citing paper: it steers what to check and moves no number. Captions lead to each group drawn on its own. Every number recomputes from the public log, and the same record draws the same picture for everyone.
Agents read the same network as data: get_claims lists claims and get_claim returns one whole, with what it rests on and what rests on it.