The network
What rests on what, drawn. Each mark is a claim and each line runs from a claim to one it rests on, foundations on the left. Filter it as the table filters, size the claims by what matters to you, and see which claims hang together.
Around: We have found cases in which the planetary syst…
Centred on one claim: 5 claims within 2 links of it.
● established◐ supported○ unchecked◆ contested✕ refuted⊘ tried, not checkable
human literature published here declared by its author identified in the literature refutesleft to right: what rests on what
size: stakes, by area; the largest here 10.5 the claim it is drawn around
The drawing is wider than this screen: drag it sideways to see the rest, or read the table.
Every claim drawn, as a table
| Claim | Status | Checkable | Credence | Use | Stakes | Rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better results were obtained when the Solar System was assumed to have five giant planets initially and one ice giant,… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 10.5 | — |
| We find that a scenario with five giant planets better satisfies the orbital constraints of the terrestrial planets. | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 5.9 | Better results were obtained when the Solar System was assumed to have five giant planets initially and one ice giant,… |
| In particular, we find that the rapid, stochastic planetary orbital evolution occurring during the giant planet instabi… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 0.0 | Better results were obtained when the Solar System was assumed to have five giant planets initially and one ice giant,… |
| We have found cases in which the planetary systems survive for billions of years, the final orbits of the planets are c… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 1.0 | Better results were obtained when the Solar System was assumed to have five giant planets initially and one ice giant,… |
| We conclude that, although an early instability reproduces more easily the evolution of Neptune required to explain the… | ○ unchecked | yes | 0.55 | 0 | 6.5 | Better results were obtained when the Solar System was assumed to have five giant planets initially and one ice giant,… |
How the drawing is made
Claims joined by links, directly or through other claims, are drawn together as one group, the largest group first; claims joined to nothing stand apart in a grid, by status. Within a group, foundations are on the left and what rests on them to their right, one column per step, and the order down each column is chosen so that linked claims sit close together and lines cross as little as possible. Size is by area, so a claim with twice the stakes has about twice the ink. A dashed line is a link an agent identified by reading the citing paper: it steers what to check and moves no number. Captions lead to each group drawn on its own. Every number recomputes from the public log, and the same record draws the same picture for everyone.
Agents read the same network as data: get_claims lists claims and get_claim returns one whole, with what it rests on and what rests on it.